Saturday, March 28, 2009

Zipo Lighter Fluid Drying Out

La Pontinia Rinnovabili Vs Comune e Provincia


Come annunciato lo scorso 10 Febbraio 2009 con comunicato, la società Pontinia Rinnovabili srl, l'azienda intenzionata a costruire la centrale a biomasse, ha presentato ricorso al TAR contro il Comune di Pontinia e la Provincia di Latina chiedendo il risarcimento dei danni a fronte del NO espresso dal Sindaco di Pontinia e dalla Provincia di Latina alla costruzione della centrale.

Un NO motivato soprattutto dalle dimensioni che questa centrale dovrebbe avere con una produzione stimata di 22 MW a fronte degli 8 necessari e richiesti da Piani provinciali e regionali.



Secondo l'azienda i due Enti stanno provocando un danno che ammonterebbe a circa 20 milioni di euro se non si procederà al piu presto a dare l'assenso. La Pontinia Rinnovabili critica alle amministrazioni scarsa sensibilità verso le urgenze occupazionali e di rilancio of this area at this point that the real risk of losing a "NO POLICY" a project with high environmental value economic impact of extraordinary importance. least for them, you might say. In fact, the Renewable Pontinia risk losing funding from the Ministry for Productive Activities for 8 million euro (falling in the incentives CIP6).



The use of TAR does not seem to bother the mayor convinced of his own choice. He expects that the Joint Conference State-Regions, the technical panel that the province of Latina has designated as a place where the final decision will be taken and in which, according to the Renewable Pontinia, The entire project will demonstrate its necessity and goodness.



We'll see. The Network has already expressed its arguments to the contrary biomass sottolinenado oversizing of the plant and the objective difficulties in finding useful material for combustion. The TAR instead pronuncierà between 30 days and only then will verify whether the municipality will have to repay waste of time that caused the company to ensure the sustainability of the project.
is also a step closer (April 9) the Joint Conference will cover the gas turbines. A meeting really important to preserve our land and the whole province, because in addition to the gas turbine Mazzocchio decisions will be taken also for Aprilia.
We'll see who among those in power, will be the spokesman of our rights as citizens to a healthy environment and healthy.



Friday, March 13, 2009

Windows For Sand Cars

LETTERA APERTA A TORELLI PAOLO CONTRARIO ALLA TURBOGAS


Dear Councillor Paul Torelli,

do not know how to express the our surprise at the words that you uttered in the press today in the newspapers today and the Latina province. Amazement in trying to understand what faults we have spotted and why.
Given that the controversy is always sterile and inconclusive, we do not understand, we boys of the Network of Citizens, what caused the spark that gave birth to your press release.

Perhaps the finding that the administration and the institutions do not seem ALL allegiance to the central Turbogas NO to this so bad for the area?

The fact that the expropriation of land continue indifference is a sign of a total lack of interest by any person performing a public role to block the process for building. A total lack of interest going on now for two years now, even in fora such as the numerous technical meetings that have taken place, where together with our network of representatives and Tombolillo or Lilbralato, no other advisor, assessor or politician in office has never presented.

We ask ourselves, us ordinary citizens not holding any elected office , but what else will be doing more important? In the end it's their job. Certainly not ours.
And then you think too much dear Paul does not draw some kind of elective induction or even professional, to express her opinions, certainly not born of political motives but by clear motivation regarding health and development of our territory?


Even the Statute of the City of Pontinia Article 72.1 reads "All citizens , the Borough Council, trade unions and other social groups may have in the field of social services, development economic and spatial planning, proposals for action of general interest "and then again art. 72.2 " may also address requests and petitions demanding action or envisage the need for collective needs .

you ask me: who benefits a battaglia contro un mega impianto inquinante in una zona a vocazione agricola e zootecnica. Per di più minacciata dall’entrata in scena di una centrale a biomasse, che si vuole sovradimensionata rispetto alle esigenze energetiche non solo del territorio ma del paese intero? Diccelo tu chi vince in questa battaglia. O spiegaci l’’espressione creare confusione politica da “grilliani”.
Noi siamo convinti che c’è bisogno di innovare e sperimentare nuove fonti energetiche , compatibili con il tessuto agricolo del territorio. La Rete dei Cittadini non ha alcuna motivazione o direzione politica, nei fatti ha sempre dimostrato di perseguire il comune interesse e di essere coerente con ciò he preaches.
And then dear Paul, we can agree on a battle that there are problems here too?
Parliamentary Question Meloni? Bravissimo, you had to do it. It 's the duty of the office that you and anyone you do not acknowledge the merits.

To date those who had the means to stop the project Turbogas unfortunately they have not been used and still does not continue to use it. And 'this is what we want to denounce and bring to the attention of citizens and "experts", who has the burden and honor of an electoral mandate.


Thanks

NETWORK OF CITIZENS PONTINIA